Re: bits from the release team: release goals, python, X.org, amd64, timeline
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:19:30AM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
> >You'll want to direct these questions to the respective maintainers, not to
> >the release team.
> You removed "Release Goals" from my previous mail...
Er, because it was quoted text from Andi's mail, not something you had
written...
> So the question for this list is :
> "Did the release team evaluate the pertinence of having nfsv4 support as
> a release goal for etch ?"
No, because no one had proposed it as a pet release goal, and it also
doesn't seem to be a target that would require much in the way of endorsed
NMUs to support.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: bits from the release team: release goals, python, X.org, amd64, timeline
- From: Fabrice Lorrain <Fabrice.Lorrain@free.fr>
- Re: bits from the release team: release goals, python, X.org, amd64, timeline
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: bits from the release team: release goals, python, X.org, amd64, timeline
- From: Fabrice Lorrain <Fabrice.Lorrain@free.fr>
- Prev by Date:
Re: binNMU requests for the ocaml transition
- Next by Date:
Re: powerpc64, multiarch vs biarch and etch ... (Was: bits from the release team: release goals, python, X.org, amd64, timeline)
- Previous by thread:
Re: bits from the release team: release goals, python, X.org, amd64, timeline
- Next by thread:
Re: bits from the release team: release goals, python, X.org, amd64, timeline
- Index(es):