fre, 21,.04.2006 kl. 21.37 -0700, skrev Steve Langasek: > > I've now checked both up and down in the dependency-chain of > > evolution-data-server and nothing either way uses /usr/X11R6. After > > tonights dinstall everything will be in place to build gtkhtml, e-d-s > > and evolution again. > > Can we go with this? > As long as none of these libraries are going through soname changes, then > yes, please go ahead. > If they are going through soname changes, the checks are more complicated > than just looking at the dependency chain itself... Unfortunately, as seen in the first mail of this thread, there are soname-changes in libedataserver, libcamel, libegroupwise and libexchange-storage. The libcamel-issue is particularly painful, as it got some libs which don't have soname-changes. In the past versions this has lead to it conflicting/replacing with previous versions of itself. We have now fixed this, and don't see that there are any more issues that should hold evo/e-d-s back. All packages that use libs with soname-changes was notified over a week ago, and we would really like to go with this now, so that the GNOME-team can get the rest of 2.14 in :) If there is anything else you need to know/any more checks that need to be done, we would really like to know exactly what we have to check. Cheers :) Heikki
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel