tir, 18,.04.2006 kl. 02.07 -0700, skrev Steve Langasek:and tonight I > > also discovered that libsoup2.2 and gnome-vfs2 will need rebuilds due to > > the the upload of libgnutls13. > They should not need rebuilds *for* the gnutls13 upload. libgnutls12 is > still present in testing and unstable, and gnutls13 should transition > smoothly into testing without requiring rebuilds of any other packages, so > there is no urgency in rebuilding anything against libgnutls13 (to my > knowledge). It's true that any new uploads that build-depend on > libgnutls-dev will link against libgnutls13 now, but that shouldn't be a > problem. The problem I see with this, is that evolution will build against both libgnutls13 (due to libgnutls-dev) and libgnutls12 (due to libsoup2.2 still being built against it). I can't guarantee that this will introduce any problems, but it's kinda awkward to have it depend on both versions ;) > > This (and the rest of gnome for that matter) will luckily not get > > tangled up in the x11-common-transition, but the way things seems at the > > moment, that will probably be over before we can go on with uploading > > the new evo and friends to unstable. > I'm not sure of this. I haven't done a comprehensive review of the packages > currently using /usr/X11R6/bin to make sure none of these packages use GNOME > libs; if any do, and if the packages are significant, a GNOME shlibs bump > could still delay the xorg transition. I did a check on this and didn't find anything, but I might have overlooked something, so ... > So I would appreciate it if you would continue to hold off for a few days > before uploading the new evo packages, while we put together a clearer > picture. ... that's ok with us. Cheers :) Heikki
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel