Hi, On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 04:05:53PM +0900, Tatsuki Sugiura wrote: > I need suggestion for dependency bug #321191. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=321191 > I apology about I forgot to fix this bug Long time. > But now, I hesitate to upload or not for little fix. > > Problem Summary; > I wrote wrong dependency for libgettext-ruby-util, that depends > on "libgettext-ruby | libgettext-ruby1.8". Actually this is bad. > When people install libgettext-ruby-util, apt will choice > libgettext-ruby1.6 instead of 1.8. So these utils don't work. > But, people can take a workaround who install libgettext-ruby1.8. > And, I can fix this problem by just edit Depends field. > It's all. > Should I upload new version to sarge-proposed-update for this > small fix? or, reduce priority of bug and say "install 1.8"? > Please tell me your suggestion. In my opinion, such a broken dependency is worth an update to stable. The ultimate decision rests with Joey, the Stable Release Manager. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature