On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:43:37PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:03:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > This is a pretty short list... Would anyone object to binNMUs of the > > > effected packages on hppa, once a fixed glibc is uploaded? > > If the bug is in glibc, why would any of these packages need binNMUs? > Only if they were statically linked - I doubt that's the case. > But the reason for the list was to make it easier for the buildd maintainer > to know which packages with previously failed builds could be requeued. Oh, well... at this point, it's probably just easier to assume "all of them". :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature