Re: BinNMU qbankmanager
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes. This has just been done.
Thanks a lot!
> There's really no need to send mails about individual binNMU candidates in
> the C++ c2a transition, though. You might let us know in a couple of weeks
> if we've *missed* some rebuilds, but at the moment I already have a very
> long todo list of binNMUs to requeue.
Yeah, that was my intention, too, especially when the dependencies
aren't available yet on all archs. The other priority asked about the
uninstallability problems.
Anyhow. Don't want to use up more of your precious time by writing long
mails...
Kind regards and thanks again
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
Reply to: