Re: release policy text changes
* Blars Blarson (blarson@blars.org) [050620 23:42]:
> In article <[🔎] 20050619151539.GF10902@mails.so.argh.org>
> aba@not.so.argh.org writes:
>
> There seems to be a conflict:
>
> > (l) Mail
> > {+/usr/sbin/sendmail must provide
> > the -bs switch, unless the package conflicts with LSB.+}
>
>
> > (p) Linux Standard Base
> > Packages must not conflict with requirements of the LSB,
> > v1.3.
> Perhaps the latter should be modified to allow for explicit conflicts
> with LSB for optional or extra packages?
Frankly speaking, I think that's too wide. If there is good reason, we
can always add an exception like for MTAs.
Cheers,
Andi
Reply to: