On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:57:02AM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Il giorno mar, 08/11/2005 alle 21.51 -0500, Nathanael Nerode ha scritto: > > This is just a rundown of what little is left, and why. > [...] > > postgis -- Steve Langasek suggested removal > [...] > About postgis, the maintainer and I had a lot of problems in getting a > new version of the package. Moreover we decided to have two versions of > the package, so we created postgis1 (already in NEW) and postigs0 > (should be uploaded shortly) that will replace postgis. > The new version is compiled with gcc-4.0 and should fix the transition > problem. So I hope the release team would remove postgis and accept > postgis1. The postgis source package has already been removed from testing. In addition, the existing postgis source package is already libpostgis1; is there a good reason for renaming this source package? I guess the binary package has changed names from libpostgis1-pg74 to libpostgis1-pg7.4, and this covers us for the C++ ABI transition? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature