[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:39:06PM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> I have a question:

> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:17:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >  * Rename and Rebuild the libraries listed below. The new suffix for
> >    these packages should be in any case "c2a" (instead of "c2"). No
> >    new suffix is needed when the soname changes in a new upstream
> >    upload.

> What about the libraries that had a SONAME change for the last c102 ->
> c2 ABI change but no SONAME change for this one?  In my case it's
> libscim8 from scim.  Should I just change it to libscim8a, or to
> libscim8c2a regardless to be consistent with others?

> I know either way will work, but I'd like to see an official
> recommendation so that there are less likely discrepancies between
> Debian and Ubuntu/other unofficial packages.

Please use libscim8c2a for consistency.

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: