Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration
I have a question:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:17:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> * Rename and Rebuild the libraries listed below. The new suffix for
> these packages should be in any case "c2a" (instead of "c2"). No
> new suffix is needed when the soname changes in a new upstream
What about the libraries that had a SONAME change for the last c102 ->
c2 ABI change but no SONAME change for this one? In my case it's
libscim8 from scim. Should I just change it to libscim8a, or to
libscim8c2a regardless to be consistent with others?
I know either way will work, but I'd like to see an official
recommendation so that there are less likely discrepancies between
Debian and Ubuntu/other unofficial packages.