[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFFE: portmap 5-11

On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 09:25:35PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:45:14PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>>I agree with Joey here. I meant to have that improvement on sarge but now I
>>>see that my postint needed a lot of improvement. The changes introduced by
>>>Anibal have made the situation worst, by adding a new configuration file
>>>you've forced an unnecesary deviation from sarge (/etc/default/portmap) to
>>>sid (/etc/portmap.conf).
>>RC bug #305505 was a direct result of your patch, it isn't your
>>fault anyway.
>It is my fault. I should have tested it properly and should have introduced 
>the changes I commented in my mail. I'm open to helping you fix the bugs 
>introduced with the file change if you agree that the configuration file 
>change should be reverted (i.e. /etc/default/portmap instead of 

I agree, thanks Javier.

>If so, the change should be reverted as soon as 
>possible (probably going back to -10 and fixing the RC bug there)




Anibal Monsalve Salazar
 .''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `'  http://debian.org/
  `-   http://v7w.com/anibal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: