On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 09:25:35PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: >On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:45:14PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >>>I agree with Joey here. I meant to have that improvement on sarge but now I >>>see that my postint needed a lot of improvement. The changes introduced by >>>Anibal have made the situation worst, by adding a new configuration file >>>you've forced an unnecesary deviation from sarge (/etc/default/portmap) to >>>sid (/etc/portmap.conf). >> >>RC bug #305505 was a direct result of your patch, it isn't your >>fault anyway. > >It is my fault. I should have tested it properly and should have introduced >the changes I commented in my mail. I'm open to helping you fix the bugs >introduced with the file change if you agree that the configuration file >change should be reverted (i.e. /etc/default/portmap instead of >/etc/portmap.conf). I agree, thanks Javier. >If so, the change should be reverted as soon as >possible (probably going back to -10 and fixing the RC bug there) Okay. >Regards > >Javier Regards, Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature