On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:45:14PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >I agree with Joey here. I meant to have that improvement on sarge but now I > >see that my postint needed a lot of improvement. The changes introduced by > >Anibal have made the situation worst, by adding a new configuration file > >you've forced an unnecesary deviation from sarge (/etc/default/portmap) to > >sid (/etc/portmap.conf). > > RC bug #305505 was a direct result of your patch, it isn't your > fault anyway. It is my fault. I should have tested it properly and should have introduced the changes I commented in my mail. I'm open to helping you fix the bugs introduced with the file change if you agree that the configuration file change should be reverted (i.e. /etc/default/portmap instead of /etc/portmap.conf). If so, the change should be reverted as soon as possible (probably going back to -10 and fixing the RC bug there) Regards Javier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature