Hi Dave, On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 07:39:03PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > It's 8 days old now so I guess in 2 days it'll be in testing > however it fixes RC bug on libpixman 309674 and indirectly helps > fix separate grave bug on oregano 309645 which needed it's own patch, > now done. "important" is not an RC severity. I've approved this update, but there's nothing here to suggest this is an RC bug in libpixman AFAICT. > My preference is still to remove the cairo packages from sarge, > which includes libpixman as I asked earlier: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01167.html > and it's dependent packages that are going into sarge, which is > just oregano at this point, although oregano has another RC > bug right now. On the contrary, oregano is currently *not* in sarge (though I assume the maintainers are going to try to get their subsequent RC bug fixed so it can be let back in), whereas libgpewidget1 is. If you want libcairo removed from sarge, please talk to the libgpewidget maintainer about dropping his dependency on libcairo or agreeing to have gpewidget removed from sarge. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature