[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GKrellM bugs #309089, #310471

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:02:38PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> Philipp Hartmann wrote:
> >The recent NMU of Samuel (see #309089) to link GKrellM against GNUTLS
> >introduced a bug (#310471), for which I already filed a patch.
> >
> >Since the GKrellM package version 2.2.5-1.2 is now hinted into Sarge, I
> >would like to know how this should be handled.
> >
> >The crashes will render the package unusable for all user that check
> >more than one SSL enabled mailbox with GKrellM. I think, there are many
> >of them out there, including me ;-)
> >
> >So IMHO, the version 2.2.5-1.2 should definitely NOT go into the
> >release. But I don't feel authorised to raise the severity of bug
> >#310471, since the package is not completely unusable.
> >
> >Due to the hint, the package goes to testing tomorrow.
> >Therefore, I send you this mail.
> >
> >What do you think?

> Thanks for noticing and fixing this so fast (I made some tests but I did 
> not think of thread-safeness issues...). I also think that it should be 
> corrected before entering sarge (though strictly speaking I also don't 
> think it's a RC bug).

> I can have an NMU ready with your updated patch quite soon. 
> Debian-release, what do you think? Should I upload it as soon as 
> possible (i.e. before it enters sarge)? I'll do so in a few hours unless 
> someone objects to it in the meantime.

gkrellm 2.2.5-1.3 approved.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: