[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please consider cpufreqd 1.2.3-1 for Sarge



Hi Mattia,

On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:16:15PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:54:54PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > > I uploaded a new upstream (oh well, upstream is me) of cpufreqd. It
> > > fixes 3 memomry leaks and a segfault, changes are really trivial (diff
> > > is included below).
> > > There are no bugs in the BTS regarding those issues.

> > Approved.

> Sorry to come up with cpufreqd again: I built 1.2.3-2 that adds one more
> debconf template translation (Vietnamese) but before uploading I'd
> like to hear thoughts about the possibility to push it again in order
> not to block 1.2.3-1 from entering sarge.

> A snippet from changes file
> ,---------------------------
> | Closes: 310147 310149
> | Changes: 
> |  cpufreqd (1.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=high
> |  .
> |    * Added Vietnamese debconf translation (closes: #310147)
> |    * Corrected a typo in debconf templates (also cleared in translations)
> |      (closes: #310149)
> `---------------------------

> Also, is urgency=high ok in case of positive answers?

Please use urgency=medium for translation uploads.

This added translation should be ok and template fix should be fine, but
you'll have to upload it soon to get it in in time. :)

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: