Re: Please consider cpufreqd 1.2.3-1 for Sarge
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:54:54PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > I uploaded a new upstream (oh well, upstream is me) of cpufreqd. It
> > fixes 3 memomry leaks and a segfault, changes are really trivial (diff
> > is included below).
> > There are no bugs in the BTS regarding those issues.
>
> Approved.
Sorry to come up with cpufreqd again: I built 1.2.3-2 that adds one more
debconf template translation (Vietnamese) but before uploading I'd
like to hear thoughts about the possibility to push it again in order
not to block 1.2.3-1 from entering sarge.
A snippet from changes file
,---------------------------
| Closes: 310147 310149
| Changes:
| cpufreqd (1.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=high
| .
| * Added Vietnamese debconf translation (closes: #310147)
| * Corrected a typo in debconf templates (also cleared in translations)
| (closes: #310149)
`---------------------------
Also, is urgency=high ok in case of positive answers?
thanks
--
mattia
:wq!
Reply to: