Re: please consider faqomatic_2.721-6 for sarge
I wouldn't call this important, as it's not a critical package or
anything. I would make it a normal or even minor severity bug.
Andrew Donnellan
On 5/21/05, Jereme Corrado <jereme@zoion.net> wrote:
> Please consider faqomatic_2.721-6 for inclusion in sarge, in lieu of
> 2.721-4, which is currently frozen in testing.
>
> The freeze anouncement said that changes would be accepted into
> testing if they meet these criteria:
>
> - fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority:
> optional or extra, only when this can be done via unstable
>
> - documentation fixes
>
> - translation updates
>
>
> 2.721-5 satisfies the first and second conditions, here is the
> changelog:
>
> * Extended the maintenace job setup to accomodate multiple FOMs.
> (closes: #303178).
> * Extended README.Debian to explain how to setup multiple FOMs.
> * Added NEWS.Debian.
>
> 303178 was tagged with severity `important' by the originial submitter
> and faqomatic is an optional package. I would really like to see this
> fix included in sarge, without it, you can't run multiple FOM's.
>
> 2.721-6 satisfies the third, it's simply the Czech debconf translation
> that I recieved a few days ago. Changelog:
>
> * Added Czech debconf translation, (thanks Miroslav Kure; closes:
> #308060).
>
> My sponsor was kind enough to upload to unstable. Thanks for your
> consideration.
>
> --
> Jereme Corrado <jereme@zoion.net>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
--
Heritage Linux Group
http://www.heritagelinux.tk
Reply to: