[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Please accept belocs-locales-data 2.3.4-7sarge2



On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 01:27:35AM +0200, I wrote:
[...]
> I just uploaded 2.3.4-7sarge1 to t-p-u with some items from 1-3-4.
> IMO all these changes can be seen as l10n updates, I threw away changes
> which do not directly modify localized output of applications.

Here is a new update (there has been no comment about -7sarge1) to fix
two recently reported l10n bugreports.
These backports only contain l10n improvements and fixes in date output.
Thanks for considering.

   belocs-locales-data (2.3.4-7sarge2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
   
     * Backport changes from 2.3.4-13
   
     * New patch:
       + bz58_update_uk_UA.diff
         Updated version, by Volodymyr M. Lisivka
         <v_lisivka at sourceforge net>.  See #307940
         Only LC_TIME section has been included in this backport to
         fix wrong display of dates.
     * debian/po/vi.po: New Vietnamese translation of debconf templates,
       by Clytie Siddall.  See #309332
   
    -- Denis Barbier <barbier@debian.org>  Tue, 17 May 2005 22:09:38 +0200
   
   belocs-locales-data (2.3.4-7sarge1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
   
     * Backport changes from 2.3.4-12
   
     * New patches:
       + fix_date_fmt.diff
         Fix d_t_fmt and date_fmt in fo_FO, by Jacob Sparre Andersen
         <sparre at nbi dk>
         Fix date_fmt in French locales.
       + bz588_fix_el_GR_am_pm.diff
         Fix Greek locale to use 12hr notation.  Patch provided by
         Konstantinos Margaritis <markos at debian org>.
       + update_CVS.diff
         Grab changes in fa_IR from upstream CVS.
       + fix_other_typos_fr.po.diff
         More fixes in French translation.
   
     * Modified patch:
       + bts279697_new_wo_SN.diff
         Fix day and abday fields.  Patch by Christian Perrier and
         Mouhamadou Mamoune Mbacke.
   
    -- Denis Barbier <barbier@debian.org>  Wed, 11 May 2005 23:15:19 +0200



Reply to: