Re: Can a new ClamAV be considered for sarge?

[Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>]

In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote:
> Since version 0.84 of clamav made it into sarge, upstream has (again)
> done some work on the scanning engine, which means that certain
> signatures retrieved by the clam updater are not usable by the version
> of clamav in sarge.  This doesn't render the version in sarge useless -
> it still uses most of the signatures, just not those of the newest type.

But in that case it should be removed from Sarge; it gives a false sense
of security.

Cheers,
        Moritz