Em Sex, 2005-05-13 às 17:58 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu: > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:12:49PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > 2.6.4-3 is now in the pool and has been built by some arches already; > > the changes are now only the ones refered to in the -2 changelog, with > > all the unintended ones reverted. > > It fails with ENOSPC on s390 after using nearly 3GiB of disc. Just FYI, this usage of space looks normal when comparing to earlier versions which were successfully built on s390, like 2.6.4-1: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gtk%2B2.0&ver=2.6.4-1&arch=s390&stamp=1113846141&file=log&as=raw 2.6.4-2 is not a good comparison base, because it was mistakenly built with static stuff disabled. I assume the buildd will automatically requeue the package; any recommendation as to an action which would help the buildd maintainers, though? Thanks, -- kov@debian.org: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov> Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://www.debian-br.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part