On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 02:54:21PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > This is perhaps relevant for the 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-8 upload. Looks like we > have three options: > 1) Let 4.1.4beta2-8 go into sarge, fixing one important bug (#304245) but > letting others (#297359) pass. (Looks like my Closes: line in 4.1.4beta2-8 > was too broad; I'll reopen #297359 later today.) > 2) Try to backport more fixes from 4.1.4 final into a 4.1.4beta2-9, fixing > the other important bug (#297359) as well. > 3) Just let 4.1.4 final in; trying to backport stuff from 4.1.4 to 4.1.4beta2 > might be a lot less stable than just taking 4.1.4 in (and there are > nothing but bugfixes from 4.1.4beta2 to 4.1.4 final anyhow). > What are your thoughts on this? I'd much prefer #3, but I've been told > earlier it's out of the question... I'd really like to see individual, self-contained bugfixes, not just whatever bugfixes upstream has thrown in in the hope that this will be more stable. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature