Re: [daniel@vision.ime.usp.br: Re: autofs 4.1.4 in sarge]
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 03:01:11PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> 1) Let 4.1.4beta2-8 go into sarge, fixing one important bug (#304245) but
>> letting others (#297359) pass. (Looks like my Closes: line in 4.1.4beta2-8
>> was too broad; I'll reopen #297359 later today.)
>> 2) Try to backport more fixes from 4.1.4 final into a 4.1.4beta2-9, fixing
>> the other important bug (#297359) as well.
>> 3) Just let 4.1.4 final in; trying to backport stuff from 4.1.4 to 4.1.4beta2
>> might be a lot less stable than just taking 4.1.4 in (and there are
>> nothing but bugfixes from 4.1.4beta2 to 4.1.4 final anyhow).
> I'd really like to see individual, self-contained bugfixes, not just
> whatever bugfixes upstream has thrown in in the hope that this will be more
> stable.
OK. I've uploaded 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-9 to sid, which contains a backport which
should fix #297359 (at least it fixes the problem for the bug submitter).
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply to: