On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:30:04PM -0400, sean finney wrote: > first, congrats on finally making it here. > i have a couple sid -> sarge requests for my packages, and a question > about one. i'll try and keep this short and succinct, as i'm sure > you're getting a bunch of these. none of the packages involve new > upstream releases, or any significant changes, only bugfixes and > translations. > package : sugarplum > version : 0.9.10-10. > rationale : it fixes a really anoying bug and will also hopefully make > post-sarge transitions easier. Approved. > package : cacti > version : 0.8.6c-7 > rationale : again, it closes a couple annoying bugs, and also includes > upstream's list of official 'bugfix' patches. Approved. FWIW, the 04_cacti_official_patches.dpatch could use a bit of cleanup, as it contains .orig and .rej chunks. > package : cacti-cactid > version : 0.8.6d-6 > rationale : only a translation update Um... the only thing changed in this translation diff was the Project-Id-Version. :) Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature