On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:15:46AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote: > * Esteban Manchado Velázquez (zoso@foton.es) disait : > > But, it has two new patches for fixing bugs (_not_ in the BTS), and they > > don't seem to be wannabe-RCs (don't really know the bugs well, Alexis?). It > > also adds a dependency on dpatch, for the new patches. > Indeed. Let me explain what those patches are for: > Those two patches are about the ftp transfer mode of backup-manager. > The first patch close a bug against the ftp transfer mode. The ftp > connection was not explicitly set to "binary mode". this patch is just > about adding a ftp->binary() statement. > The second one, could frankly be disabled for sarge. It's just something > about a feature request: enabling the facility to clean the ftp > directory before uploading the files. > If those patches are not welcome, we can easily drop them thakns to the > dpatch system. > IMHO, the important thing for sarge is the translations. Please go ahead and upload with the full set of changes; the release team will have to review the diff to see just what the patches are changing, but by the description of the bugs it should be ok. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature