[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: advice for lilypond



On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:09:18PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:

> I've agreed to take over lilypond, the excellent music typesetting
> engine.

> The current Debian version is based on upstream version 2.2.6, and my
> adopting upload brought it into a releasable state.

> Upstream would really like me to upload the latest stable version,
> however, which is 2.4.5.  I am inclined to agree.  Shall I go ahead?

> (I'm asking because of the request not to introduce new upstream
> versions unnecessarily.)

> Upstream maintains separate stable and development branches, so the
> 2.4.5 release has received plenty of testing, and is overall just so
> much better than the 2.2 branch.  Also, lilypond is a "leaf" package
> in the dependency graph, so it should cause minimal disruption.  Shall
> I go ahead and start preparing a 2.6.5 upload?

As long as this doesn't adversely affect alml and songwrite, this isn't a
problem; please coordinate with the maintainers of those packages prior to
upload.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: