Re: buildd build order [Was: arm buildd holdup?]
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 10:52:41PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > What is the ordering criteria on the buildds?
>
> According to the documentation:
>
> The packages are ordered by the following criteria (in
> this order):
>
> - out-of-date/uncompiled (the former come first)
> - priority (e.g. "required" before "optional")
> - section (alphabetically)
> - package name (alphabetically)
[..]
> Basicly, when there are no new/uncompiled packages involved, the
> order is by priority, then section, then alphabetically.
That's useful to know, but doesn't seem to be correct in the arm case at
least.
1. geda-gschem, speex and wipl are all out-of-date.
2. geda-gschem, speex and wipl are all priority low.
3. geda-gschem is section electronics.
wipl is section net.
speex is section sound.
4. geda-gschem < speex < wipl
Yet wipl was uploaded yesterday and is #9, speex is #19, and
geda-gschem is #36 (and slipping).
What's the purpose of sorting by section in the ordering?
I suppose the real problem is that there doesn't seem to be any
progress on the queue.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: