Re: Re: arm buildd holdup?

[Hamish Moffatt <hamish@cloud.net.au>]

Goswin wrote:
> Need-build is a good sign. http://buildd.net/ shows you are on place
> 37 out of 120. I suggest just waiting unless the buildd has stoped
> altogether.

What is the ordering criteria on the buildds?

I notice that speex (for example) was uploaded on Feb 26 with priority 
low and it's 7th on the arm list, but geda-gschem was uploaded on Feb 23 
with priority low and it's 35th. quodlibet was uploaded on March 4 (also 
priority low) and it's 6th.

Is it FIFO within the priority levels? I would've expected so.


thanks,
Hamish