Re: Suggestion: Release sarge without security support

To: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Release sarge without security support
From: Clint Byrum <cbyrum@spamaps.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:00:23 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 1101160823.29346.64.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20041122195300.GR30627@mails.so.argh.org>
References: <[🔎] Pine.GSO.4.33.0411221059590.552-100000@mint.u.arizona.edu> <[🔎] 87ekilwy3n.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] 1101148095.29346.33.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 20041122195300.GR30627@mails.so.argh.org>

On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 20:53 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Furthermore, d-release is _not_ a discussion list.
> 

Point taken, and discussion ended.

-- 
Clint Byrum <cbyrum@spamaps.org>

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Suggestion: Release sarge without security support
  - From: Andre Lehovich <andrel@U.Arizona.EDU>
- Re: Suggestion: Release sarge without security support
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: Suggestion: Release sarge without security support
  - From: Clint Byrum <cbyrum@spamaps.org>
- Re: Suggestion: Release sarge without security support
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#282276: bigloo: FTBFS in sarge: skribe is missing.
Next by Date: Re: Woody->Sarge upgrade report
Previous by thread: Re: Suggestion: Release sarge without security support
Next by thread: Re: Suggestion: Release sarge without security support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread