Re: Classification of some arm builds that are 'Building'

[Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>]

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> ...
> redland: Unsatisfyable build-depends, should be Dep-Wait librasqal0-dev >= 0.9.2

librasqal0-dev_0.9.2-1_arm.deb has been in the archive since August 15th 
(6 days after it tried and failed to build redland) and should have been 
buildable from that date.  I has assumed something/somebody would get 
round to building that eventually, once the arm package backlog had been 
reduced.  That would be possible now I'd hope.

Thanks

Dave