Re: Classification of some arm builds that are 'Building'
- To: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
- Cc: arm@buildd.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, octave2.0@packages.debian.org, mico@packages.debian.org, gmfsk@packages.debian.org, libdbd-sqlite-perl@packages.debian.org, libgnome2-perl@packages.debian.org, crossfire-client@packages.debian.org, unison@packages.debian.org, crimson@packages.debian.org, timidity@packages.debian.org, ant-phone@packages.debian.org, gnobog@packages.debian.org, zinf@packages.debian.org, gnome-cups-manager@packages.debian.org, sear@packages.debian.org, gnuradio@packages.debian.org, quiteinsanegimpplugin@packages.debian.org, kvirc@packages.debian.org, attal@packages.debian.org, cuyo@packages.debian.org, arson@packages.debian.org, redland@packages.debian.org, sip4-qt3@packages.debian.org, gnome-applets@packages.debian.org, multisync@packages.debian.org, enigmail@packages.debian.org, kbear@packages.debian.org, psi@packages.debian.org, mcrypt@packages.debian.org, alogg@packages.debian.org, xsidplay@packages.debian.org, illuminator@packages.debian.org, libbonobomm1.3@packages.debian.org, libselinux@packages.debian.org, renaissance@packages.debian.org, tetex-bin@packages.debian.org, simulavr@packages.debian.org, bidentd@packages.debian.org, owl@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Classification of some arm builds that are 'Building'
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:00:24 +1000
- Message-id: <20040914120024.GB5568@cloud.net.au>
- Mail-followup-to: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>, arm@buildd.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, octave2.0@packages.debian.org, mico@packages.debian.org, gmfsk@packages.debian.org, libdbd-sqlite-perl@packages.debian.org, libgnome2-perl@packages.debian.org, crossfire-client@packages.debian.org, unison@packages.debian.org, crimson@packages.debian.org, timidity@packages.debian.org, ant-phone@packages.debian.org, gnobog@packages.debian.org, zinf@packages.debian.org, gnome-cups-manager@packages.debian.org, sear@packages.debian.org, gnuradio@packages.debian.org, quiteinsanegimpplugin@packages.debian.org, kvirc@packages.debian.org, attal@packages.debian.org, cuyo@packages.debian.org, arson@packages.debian.org, redland@packages.debian.org, sip4-qt3@packages.debian.org, gnome-applets@packages.debian.org, multisync@packages.debian.org, enigmail@packages.debian.org, kbear@packages.debian.org, psi@packages.debian.org, mcrypt@packages.debian.org, alogg@packages.debian.org, xsidplay@packages.debian.org, illuminator@packages.debian.org, libbonobomm1.3@packages.debian.org, libselinux@packages.debian.org, renaissance@packages.debian.org, tetex-bin@packages.debian.org, simulavr@packages.debian.org, bidentd@packages.debian.org, owl@packages.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20040914110647.GA18918@A-Eskwadraat.nl>
- References: <20040914110647.GA18918@A-Eskwadraat.nl>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 01:06:47PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> gmfsk: configure failure, should be Failed, #271651 filed
I would've guessed this is an fftw bug, but I have absolutely no way to
prove it either way. Can someone help me out?
Maybe a rebuild of gmfsk with the latest fftw would help. Could someone
trigger that please?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: