Re: Processed: Re: Bug#262236: Acknowledgement (apsfilter: FTBFS: Please replace 'exim' with 'exim4' in Build-Depends)
Andreas Jochens <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> What would be the correct bug severity for 'Arch: all' packages which do
> not autobuild because of missing or incorrect Build-Depends?
My understanding is that these are release critical bugs according to
the published release criteria, if they are relevent to sarge. (That
is, "FTBFS with gcc 3.4" is not release critical.)
> I filed several bug reports and patches for such problems with
> severity 'normal'. Some of those bugs were later set to 'serious'
> by others. (Fortunately, most of these bugs have been fixed already -
> at least in 'sid'.)
I have upgraded such bugs when within my purview (generally for QA