[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SableVM 1.1.6-6 needs hinting for Sarge


I didn't think hinting might not be needed if I only update sablevm.

Thanks for explanation and sorry for the noise,

				Grzegorz B. Prokopski

W liście z nie, 29-08-2004, godz. 20:44, Steve Langasek pisze: 
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 02:42:31PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > At http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~sarge/?package=sablevm I have already
> > filled in all informations about why SableVM 1.1.6-6 should be in Sarge.
> > In summary, a couple of serious bugs were discovered lately by our users
> > and they had to be fixed with new upload.
> > But because SableVM source packages are split in sablevm and
> > sablevm-classlib - they still need hinting to get into testing/Sarge.
> This does not appear to be the case; sablevm-classlib is up-to-date in
> sarge right now, so there's nothing to hint here.
> > PS:  The finally built ARM version has just hit incoming.d.o.
> > This means SableVM is built and, to our best knowledge, fully functional
> > on all Debian architectures.
> This may have been the reason keeping sablevm out, then.  The problem
> seems to have fixed itself, sablevm is now up-to-date in sarge according
> to madison.
> Cheers,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski      <gadek@debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux           http://www.debian.org
SableVM - LGPL'ed Java VM  http://www.sablevm.org
Why SableVM ?!?            http://devel.sablevm.org/wiki/Features

Reply to: