On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 02:42:31PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > At http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~sarge/?package=sablevm I have already > filled in all informations about why SableVM 1.1.6-6 should be in Sarge. > In summary, a couple of serious bugs were discovered lately by our users > and they had to be fixed with new upload. > But because SableVM source packages are split in sablevm and > sablevm-classlib - they still need hinting to get into testing/Sarge. This does not appear to be the case; sablevm-classlib is up-to-date in sarge right now, so there's nothing to hint here. > PS: The finally built ARM version has just hit incoming.d.o. > This means SableVM is built and, to our best knowledge, fully functional > on all Debian architectures. This may have been the reason keeping sablevm out, then. The problem seems to have fixed itself, sablevm is now up-to-date in sarge according to madison. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature