Re: Bug#267096: serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 10:10:44PM -0400, Ryan Golbeck wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
> > Having reviewed the diff between 0.4.1 and 0.5.2, I'm ok with pushing
> > 0.5.2-3 directly into testing.
> > The versioned shlibs issue doesn't seem to be release-critical in that
> > case, since there is no version of libidn11 in a stable release that
> > doesn't contain idn_free.
> > If you don't want 0.5.2-3 in testing, let me know and we can go the
> > t-p-u route.
> 0.5.2-3 is perfect for me. Push it in.
Ok, hinted. This should take effect as soon as the new version is
available on s390.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
- From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#267096: serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
- From: Ryan Golbeck <rmgolbeck@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#267096: serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#267096: serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
- From: Ryan Golbeck <rmgolbeck@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#267096: serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#267096: serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
- From: Ryan Golbeck <rmgolbeck@debian.org>