Re: Bug#267096: serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
> Having reviewed the diff between 0.4.1 and 0.5.2, I'm ok with pushing
> 0.5.2-3 directly into testing.
>
> The versioned shlibs issue doesn't seem to be release-critical in that
> case, since there is no version of libidn11 in a stable release that
> doesn't contain idn_free.
>
> If you don't want 0.5.2-3 in testing, let me know and we can go the
> t-p-u route.
0.5.2-3 is perfect for me. Push it in.
Thanks,
ryan
Reply to:
- References:
- serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
- From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#267096: serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
- From: Ryan Golbeck <rmgolbeck@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#267096: serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#267096: serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
- From: Ryan Golbeck <rmgolbeck@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#267096: serious, breaks sarge, libidn11 0.5.x in testing needed
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>