Re: Please let spamassassin and spamc 2.64-1 proceed into sarge
On 2004-08-18 Joost van Baal <email@example.com> wrote:
> Spamassassin 2.64-1 is not yet built on mipsel, therefore, it's not yet
> in sarge. However, 2.64 fixes a security bug, see
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-announce&m=109168121628767&w=2 :
> I'm not sure wether it's appropriate to file an RC bug to spamassassin,
> since 2.64-1 is in unstable already.
Noting it in http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~sarge/ is probably better.
> Should we just wait for the mipsel build to complete? Or is manual
> intervention needed here?
Afaict no manual intervention is needed, the package will propagate
once it is built on mipsel.
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"