[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KDE 3.3 and sarge

On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 12:38:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 03:16:35PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > still outstanding requirement to get rid of libtiff3g for sarge.  Ben
> > > Burton has already expressed his willingness to NMU these packages if
> > > necessary; Chris, if you are available to work on this yourself, I am of
> > > course happy to work with you to get these packages ready for sarge.
> > > These uploads will in any case have to wait for libtiff4 to reach sarge,
> > > which should happen in two to three days once the new libtiff3g package
> > > is built on all architectures.

> > And kdelibs-data AGAIN caused file conflicts with
> > openoffice.org-mimelnk. See
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=265852&repeatmerged=no.

> > Should that be upgraded to serious and then tagged sarge-ignore since it
> > only is something with KDE 3.3?

> This is a serious bug, but it should be tagged sid, not sarge-ignore.  A
> "sid" tag will block the conflicting KDE3.3 from reaching sarge, a
> "sarge-ignore" tag would let it in unimpeded.

Oh, right.  Yes, the bug on openoffice ought to be tagged sarge-ignore,
and the bug on kde3.3 would be tagged sid.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: