On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 03:16:35PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > still outstanding requirement to get rid of libtiff3g for sarge. Ben > > Burton has already expressed his willingness to NMU these packages if > > necessary; Chris, if you are available to work on this yourself, I am of > > course happy to work with you to get these packages ready for sarge. > > These uploads will in any case have to wait for libtiff4 to reach sarge, > > which should happen in two to three days once the new libtiff3g package > > is built on all architectures. > And kdelibs-data AGAIN caused file conflicts with > openoffice.org-mimelnk. See > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=265852&repeatmerged=no. > Should that be upgraded to serious and then tagged sarge-ignore since it > only is something with KDE 3.3? This is a serious bug, but it should be tagged sid, not sarge-ignore. A "sid" tag will block the conflicting KDE3.3 from reaching sarge, a "sarge-ignore" tag would let it in unimpeded. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature