[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Update on "upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable" status

On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 01:04:37PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Ah, last we tried this in february or so, testing-proposed-update was
> not being autobuilt, and the result was that it was not usable for
> debian-installer, but then maybe it has changed since then ? 

There were probably problems related to the security breakin, and may've
been problems related to d-i autobuilding too. It's not meant to be broken,
at any rate.

OTOH, t-p-u isn't really a good thing to use for anything other than
security updates, and similar changes. It's not a replacement for


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
Don't assume I speak for anyone but myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking
  for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.''

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: