Re: Time to push qt-x11 and friends into testing?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:33:26AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> These are the qt2 packages. Currently they are held up because they
> break innovation3d and nurbs++ -- both of these have newer, c102
> versions in unstable which use qt3. They FTBFS on some architectures,
> so they can't go in, but if they were removed from 'testing', it looks
> like the qt2 packages could propagate. I think. :-)
Wouldn't it be more effective if you would try to fix these packages
instead of proposing to remove them?
ICE on hppa.
It would be effective if you would tell the maintainer about this issue
and/or send a bug report against gcc-3.3 (needs access to hppa since
the gcc maintainers want preprocessed source).
checking for QT moc (moc)... yes
checking for QT uic (uic)... no
configure: error: Cannot find proper QT
Needs further investigation, you could at least send a RC bug report to
notify the maintainer.
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed