On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 05:28:18PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > In article <[🔎] 20031016190307.GJ2775@tennyson.netexpress.net> you write: > >On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:36:06AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > >> Since the release-critical bugs in ecartis are not present in the > >> version in sid, would it be possible to get the removal of it from > >> sarge recended? > >However, having been removed from sarge, there should no longer be any > >reason to hold the package from getting back in. I previously reported > >on the status of past removal candidates in > ><20030927203906.GA14293@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>. > I have been unable to find this message, either with google, or the > lists.debian.org search engine. <http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2003/debian-release-200309/msg00050.html> > ecartis is still marked for removal acording to the > packages.qa.debian.org/e/ecartis web page, and dispite having no > release critical bugs that apply to the version in unstable and being > 40 days old is not propigating to testing. > What needs to be done to have the removal flag removed so it can > become part of sarge? Waking the release manager, I think. :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature