Re: non-vanilla i386 kernels botched in 2.2r3
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 01:53:22AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Your subject line is alarmist. The default kernels for i386 were
> *not* botched in 2.2r3.
Huh? That's precisely what the subject says.
> > it would be good to have 2.2r4 go out very soon with just
> > these fixes.
>
> Um, can someone explain to me the urgency of using 2.2.19 rather than
> 2.2.19pre17?
I never said that 2.2.19pre17 is broken. I was talking about the
kernel-image packages, not the boot floppies.
> My experience of the 2.2.19 kernels is that they are still unsuitable
> for building. I will research more so I can more demonstrations of
> this.
Please do so.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: