[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: potato revision one

On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 11:59:57PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Anthony Towns wrote:
> > All the security team need to do is upload the fixes into proposed-updates.
> > There's no reason for that to ever be done later rather than sooner.
> That too, but you also should post the list of package you want
> accept and refuse so people can comment on them. Release management
> is not a one-person task.

auric:~ajt/chkproposedupdates.sh and auric:~ajt/chkproposedupdates2.sh
might (or might not) be informative to people trying to grok what updates
are about and what arches haven't been doing recompiles. quinn-diff is
operating on stable+proposed-updates so autobuilders have no reason not
to be keeping up to date.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
                 We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
                                      -- Dave Clark

Attachment: pgpe5OHgIPQXS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: