Dear AndreasI am rather reluctant to follow James' example and downgrade the documentation for everyone to suit the requirements of one OS, even an important one like Debian. Reverting to the previous version of metap for your packaging also seems undesirable as there was a bug fix albeit a small one. I did not see the maintainer of mathjaxr contributing to the discussion on the R mailing list so I am cc'ing this to him to see if he has any brainwave.
One option would be for me to make a version for you to use for your packaging. I think I can do that without having to edit all the documentation files by giving you a personalised DESCRIPTION, NAMESPACE, and macros.Rd but I have not tested that yet. Of course if you package off the CRAN version that will not work.
Michael On 27/01/2021 07:57, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Michael,
there was some longer discussion about the usage of mathjaxr in
clubSandwich. The part of the discussion on the Debian R packaging list
is in the according list archive[1]. I admit I'm lacking the necessary
knowledge in R to understand the solution that was found in clubSandwich
but it would be really great if you could do the same in your package
metap since this would enable us (the Debian R packaging team) to upgrade
metap to its latest version.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2021/01/msg00021.html
-- Michael http://www.dewey.myzen.co.uk/home.html