[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Help] r-cran-bayestestr: autopkgtest regression



On 19 November 2020 at 19:07, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Control: tags 972074 pending
| Control: block 972074 by 963392
| 
| On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 07:53:06AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | 
| > | I do not have the slightest idea what this might mean.
| > 
| > ABI/API slippage in the stack. An interface changed but a package didn't recompile.
| 
| It seems it is caused by r-cran-rstanarm which in turn has a test
| suite issue itself:

[...]

| > CRAN Package Check Results for Package bayestestR
| > Last updated on 2020-11-19 13:50:51 CET.
| > 
| > Flavor  Version	Tinstall		Tcheck	Ttotal	Status	Flags
| > r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang	0.7.5	12.67	406.54	419.21	OK	
| > r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc		0.7.5	8.37	295.67	304.04	OK	
| > r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang	0.7.5			498.86	OK	
| > r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc		0.7.5			487.49	OK	
| > r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64		0.7.5	16.00	636.00	652.00	OK	
| > r-patched-linux-x86_64			0.7.5	12.72	388.61	401.33	OK	
| > r-patched-solaris-x86			0.7.5			725.40	OK	
| > r-release-linux-x86_64			0.7.5	12.04	390.98	403.02	OK	
| > r-release-macos-x86_64			0.7.5				OK	
| > r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64		0.7.5	13.00	652.00	665.00	OK	
| > r-oldrel-macos-x86_64			0.7.5				OK	
| > r-oldrel-windows-ix86+x86_64		0.7.5	11.00	500.00	511.00	OK
| 
| Not sure what information this table should provide to us.  The fact

It makes it fairly obvious that you should not contact upstream -- because
there is no issue in the upstream code.

| that things are running on those other systems is great but does not
| answer why it is not running for us. 

Exactly. It's most-likely a self-inflicted wound.  

FWIW I see that myself too when I do reverse depenency tests for Rcpp or
related packages. rstanarm is a complicated package. You could consider not
installing it for the autopkgtests for this package.

Dirk

-- 
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org


Reply to: