[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#795923: klipper: Missing transitional package for KDE5 transition



Package: klipper
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

I recently upgraded from jessie to testing and had to do a little manual
intervention.

The KDE4 `klipper` package's contents are now included in the
`plasma-workspace` package.

In order to ensure a correct upgrade experience, an empty binary `klipper`
package should exist containing just `Depends: plasma-workspace` and
the `plasma-workspace` package should add all three of:
`Conflicts: klipper` (to ensure both can't be installed at the same time),
`Replaces: klipper` (to ensure the upgraded package can be installed),
and `Provides: klipper` (to ensure that any packages with `Depends: klipper`
still work).

These transitional measures can be removed in `buster` since it is only
supported to upgrade one release at a time.

I also noticed `kde-workspace{,-bin,-data}` only exists in KDE4 but did
not figure out where exactly its contents moved. Likely there are more
packages: I don't have a full KDE install, and sometimes the package
manager is smart enough to find a way to install the new package even
if the control fields are wrong.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (600, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, powerpc, arm64, armhf

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages klipper depends on:
ii  kde-runtime  4:4.14.2-2
ii  libc6        2.19-19
ii  libkdecore5  4:4.14.2-5
ii  libkdeui5    4:4.14.2-5
ii  libprison0   1.1.1-1
ii  libqt4-dbus  4:4.8.7+dfsg-1
ii  libqtcore4   4:4.8.7+dfsg-1
ii  libqtgui4    4:4.8.7+dfsg-1
ii  libstdc++6   5.1.1-14
ii  libx11-6     2:1.6.3-1
ii  zlib1g       1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1

klipper recommends no packages.

klipper suggests no packages.


Reply to: