Re: debcheck and Suggests dbgsym packages
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:18 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Then, I'd argue that that's one valid case for the package to stay in
> the main archive instead. I.e. use a manually build -dbg package.
>
> But this is just my own opinion, I don't think there is anything
> resembling a rule on matters regarding debug packages.
Here is another opinion :)
I don't think this is special enough to warrant keeping the debug
symbols in the main archive.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: