On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 05:10:55PM +0100, Sven Wick wrote:
> On 02/25/2018 12:39 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >
> > > > * please rename d/docs to a name that is clear what it's doing (I'm
> > > > positive you don't even realize what's is instaling *where*)
> > you've removed it, is that what you want?
> >
>
> As far as I know d/docs gets installed into the first binary package from
> d/control.
Exactly. That seems to be incredibly unclear without a proper reading
of the documentation, and many people in the past blindly thought that
it would install in all the binaries or somesuch.
> I renamed it now to recutils.docs. Hope that is what you meant...
That's what I meant.
In the iteration before you just removed it without mentioning why you
would do it...
> > > > * you have an upstream signing key, but it seem to have never been
> > > > uploaded, please upload it to mentors (you need to build with -sa)
> > Now I also notice, that signing key is .pgp, i.e. it's not
> > ascii-armored. That's supported by uscan albait not being documented,
> > and then it will just convert it into an armored keyring anyway.
> > Could you please ascii-armor it?
> >
> > Also, what you uploaded as recutils_1.7.orig.tar.gz.asc is not not a
> > detached signature (as it should be), but a public key export.
>
> Yeah I used the file directly from upstream.
> Hope it's alright now...
Nope →
> > Also, what you uploaded as recutils_1.7.orig.tar.gz.asc is not not a
> > detached signature (as it should be), but a public key export.
This is still not correct.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature