Re: upgrading quantz.d.o (qa) to stretch
On 27/10/17 at 19:20 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 15:07:53 -0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > On 27/10/17 at 18:59 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 02:30:11PM -0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > At DebConf, I expressed the opinion that it would be better NOT to
> > > > upgrade it to stretch, but rather to finish identifying services that
> > > > should be split away to seperate hosts, and to end that process by
> > > > shutting down qa.debian.org.
> > >
> > > Yes, but nobody is currently actively working on that (please correct
> > > me if I'm wrong here), and I don't think is fair to ask DSA to maintain
> > > a jessie host (i.e. a snowflake between stretch hosts) just because of
> > > a wish.
> >
> > Well, one way for DSA to push that is to say that quantz won't be
> > upgraded and will be shut down at the end of the year. ;)
> >
> Why would we want to do that though?
Oh, during DebConf, I thought I understood that you found it hard to
deal with quantz because it has no clear "service owner" and also hosts
many different services which their own breakage patterns.
But if that's not a problem, sorry for the noise.
Lucas
Reply to: