[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: http:// vs. https:// in machine readable copyright file



Hi,

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:53:48PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> 
> Actually, there is at least one addition to the format that has gained traction
> since it was proposed, so maybe the best way forward is to release a version
> 1.1 with a HTTPS URL ?
> 
> The addition is the Files-Excluded field (https://bugs.debian.org/685506).  It
> is now supported in uscan.  Back in 2012 and earlier, there was some opposition
> to the use of Files-Excluded, on the grounds that something better can be done,
> but since nothing better was done, it is getting time to document this field
> appropriately.

+1

Kind regards

    Andreas (who is switching URL from http to https as well once a package is updated)

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: